As technology evolved over the last hundred or so years, so
has the availability of open and distance education. In the beginning distance
education was only obtainable through written correspondence, however if one
fast forward to the present, one finds multiple technical ways to participate
in open and distance learning in the United States such as computers, iPads,
tablets, smartphones, DVD’s, CD’s, and Youtube to name a few. I would prefer to
use a combination of computers and teleconferencing. However, if one lives in
another country like Europe, Tanzania, or China then there may be more
challenges than opportunities of the technology available. Nevertheless, a
comparative research study on the challenges and opportunities of technology
based instruction in open and distance learning was conducted on the Open University of Tanzania (OUT) and in China
the Center for Continuing and Distant Education (CCDE) : www.ubuntunet.net/sites/ubuntunet.net/files/nyandaraz.pdf.
Additionally, a case study was conducted in Greece on the use of teleconference
at a post graduate course of the Hellenic Open University: http://www.eurodl.org/. Both studies provides
one with a synopsis of the best use of technology available for educational use
and justifies my selection of technology.
In the comparative study between the Open University of
Tanzania (OUT) and the Center for Continuing and Distant Education (CCED) the
results revealed that “CCED is more advanced regarding the use of technology in
facilitating communication, delivery of e-learning materials and improving
students’ learning than OUT. Computers and Internet are the dominant e-learning
technology at CCDE along with print, CDs/DVDs, audio/videotapes and television”
(Nyandara, 2012, p. 141) . In contrast, OUT instructors
had more access to computers than their student s and they did not use the
computers to teach or utilize the free Moodle platform software. They “seemed
to be more affected by limited access to technological infrastructures,
insufficient pedagogy skills to use technology, shortage of technical and
education technologist staff and slow internet connection” (Nyandara,
2012, p. 142) .
Meanwhile in Greece at the Hellenic Open University (HOU) a
case study was conducted and focused on “specific parameters related to the
technical and pedagogical aspects of teleconference, such as the perceived ease
of use, the perceived usefulness, the social presence, and the intentional use
focusing on students of the module on Open and Distant Education of the School
of Humanities of HOU” (Mavroidis, 2013) . The study revealed
that “the term “teleconference” referred to the meeting among two or more
participants which allowed them to interact via two-way video and audio
transmissions simultaneously as well as to exchange data in real time via
Internet” (Mavroidis, 2013, p. 76) . Moreover, the
aforementioned specific parameters’ result were all positive. The students
found that teleconference was useful, easy to use the technology, and it
provided a social presence. Mavroidis (2013) contends that the use of “the
teleconference tools alone does not lead to the development of a learning
community, however collaborative activities seem to enhance the feeling of
social presence” (p.88). Furthermore, the students “believed that
teleconference would make their studies more interesting, would improve their
communication with their teacher and would help them to answer questions, exchange
ideas or discuss with other students” (p.89)
In sum, living in the United States provides an adult
educator with one of the world’s top technological infrastructure and strong
Internet connections for open and distance learning, therefore using computers
and teleconference would be extremely effective tools to facilitate open and
distance learning courses in conjunction with print material. Utilizing both
technologies as an adult educator would allow for me to construct and implement
a collaborative pedagogy approach to teaching for open and distance learning.
However, I would also use CDs/DVDs, videotapes, print materials, and mobile
phones for remotes places like Tanzania because as both studies reveal that
every country does not have access or limited access to Internet.
Reference:
Mavroidis, I. (2013). Technology Acceptance and Social
Presence in Distance Education- A Case Study On The Use Of Teleconference At A
Postgraduate Course Of The Hellenic Open University. European Journal of
Open, Distance and e-Learning, 76-96.
Nyandara, Z. I. (2012). Challenges and Opportunities
of Technology Based Instruction in Open and Distance Learning: A Comparative
Study of Tanzania and China. UbuntuNet Alliance, 130-145.
Worley,
ReplyDeleteYour blog was very informational. I like how you studied different university from different countries to let us know that this open classroom is happening all over. I find it very interesting to see the progression each country has and to see which one is leading in technology. Great post
Smith
Smith, thank you for your insightful comments and forgive me for my tardiness with a reply. Thanks again.
DeleteWorley